There is a deviation of negation at stake, and if Hegelian negation is already a deviation, one deviating from its track and splitting into two, then what is at stake here we could describe as a deviation of deviation, a clinamen of clinamen, a redoubling of clinamen. There is a concurrence of the high and the low, of elevated logical and epistemological concerns and the trifling, the frivolous which has to supplement its opposite. Let me bring in Deleuze, who is not exactly a Hegelian but who gives to this question a very Hegelian answer, more Hegelian even than Hegel. With it, language names something that is not, and its capacity to name non-being is what makes it language. […] The view that the cause of movement lies in the void contains that deeper thought that the cause of becoming pertains to the negative.9. In the same sense, the unconscious can be seen as a clinamen of cogito. Are the addresses of two temporaries guaranteed to be different in the same expression? He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce. “Zu fragmentarisch ist Welt und Leben! Dreams (some, not all) “might be said to have been already interpreted once, before being submitted to waking interpretation.”4 This is where Freud brings in Heine’s lines: This function behaves in the manner which the poet maliciously ascribes to philosophers: it fills up the gaps in the dream-structure with shreds and patches. The ghost of Hegel dominates the hallways, institutions, ... proposed to be illustrated by its facts, but Universal History"8. To simplify matters utterly, if substance was the keyword of philosophy, the guiding idea of bringing multiplicity to one underlying principle, beyond appearances and change, then one could say that the subject, in Hegel, is the name of one splitting into two, of the impossibility of any substance being one. All of them are well known, and they do what portraits were supposed to do: they present his public image, in the somewhat stiff postures that one inevitably assumes when in the public eye. Count how many times your program repeats, Curving grades without creating competition among students. Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange! Hegel remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice. Negativity is disavowed by clinging to the object that covers it up in the splendor of its positive existence, clinging to a belief against better knowledge (“I know very well, but nevertheless…”). If there is a diagnosis of the philosophical endeavor as such at stake, then this business of philosophy starts already in the unconscious—the philosopher has an accomplice in the unconscious, which starts stopping the gaps even before philosophy starts filling them in. In late July 2010, Borut Vogelnik and Miran Mohar (two members of the IRWIN group and representatives of the NSK State in Time) and myself (curator, artistic director of Hartware MedienKunstVerein [HMKV], and diplomat of the NSK State in Time) set out on a trip to Lagos, Nigeria. Freud posits it as the basic mechanism of perversion, in its technical meaning, and one should mark from the outset that per-verto is a Latin version of Ver-. Hegel could write elegant, figurative passages when inspired. Negation in Verneinung, as Freud reads it, is a special instance of repression, the second concept on the list. What is the current state of translation of Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy in English? And it often seems that the poet’s derisive comment is not unjustified when he says of the philosopher: “Mit seinen Nachtmützen und Schlafrockfetzen / Stopft er die Lücken des Weltenbaus. 311. All except one, that is, a conspicuous exception: the lithograph by Ludwig Sebbers, which shows Hegel at home, sitting at his desk, wearing a dressing gown and something like a nightcap. Sometime later, brand new D/A converters were born. Jesse Hudson, one of the most monastic and scholarly people I know, started talking about Hegel on Facebook.Hegel’s work has always felt intimidating to me, and often when I read his writing, I think that he’s totally full of shit—that he took simple, intuitive ideas and hyperinflated their elucidation to appear logically rigorous and philosophically masterful. Hegel’s atom, his elementary particle, is thus the atom itself in this precise sense: that which cannot be divided any further is the division, the split on which any unity is premised. Or ... hegel. Ver- corrodes the “no,” yet it operates only in its bosom. Yet the unconscious philosopher, stopping the gaps and providing sense, is usually less successful than his conscious counterpart. Hegel, by Martin Heidegger, was the second text to appear from division three of the Heidegger Gesamtausgabe, the first of which was Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event).The volume was originally published in German in 1993, four years after the first edition of the Contributions.Since that time, a total of sixteen volumes have appeared from division three with only two more remaining … Sigmund Freud, New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis,(Penguin Freud Library, vol. Repression means: something is negated and rejected, but only at the price of its return. Hegel notoriously maintained that if facts contradict theory, then “um so schlimmer für die Fakten”—so much the worse for the facts.